Here’s a Reddit/Slashdot/whatever thread that never happened:

Internet crank on Reddit: "Hey, Steve Jobs, I guess that new iPad looks cool, but I think iPad is a stupid name, it makes me think of sanitary napkins." Steve: "Yeah, well, here's why we called it that. (Long explanation justifying his choices)" Crank #2: "Well, why didn't you call it the iTablet? I think that would have been a good name. What does everyone else think?" Crank #3: "What does it have to be iAnything? I'm tired of the i- prefix." Steve: "We thought about that, but ... (More explanation about his choices)" Crank #1: "And really, isn't it just a bigger iPod Touch? I would never carry that around with me. And come on, you're just trying to redo the Newton anyway LOL" Steve: "My logic behind the iPad is (vision, business plan, blah blah blah)"

Can you even  imagine Steve Jobs in this sort of time-wasting and emotionally draining tit-for-tat in a thread on Slashdot? On reddit? In some blog’s comment section? Of course not. Justification of his plans would take away from the amazing things that he needed to achieve.

Naysayers are part of every project. How many people do you think pissed on Jimmy Wales’ little project to aggregate knowledge? Nobody’s going to spend their time writing encyclopedia entries! And yet there it is.  On a personal level, if I listened to everyone who thought I was wasting my time improving on find + grep you’d never have ack.

We all have to persevere in the face of adversity to ideas, but there’s more than that.  We need to ignore our detractors. Despite how silly and time-wasting it is to argue your motivations and reasons for undertaking a project, many of us feel compelled to argue with everyone who disagrees with us.  I suggest you not waste your time.

On the Internet, the attitude is “Why wasn’t I consulted?” Every anti-social child (measured by calendar or maturity) with a keyboard thinks it’s his responsibility to piss on everything he doesn’t like. They’ll be there always. You can no more make them go away than you would by arguing with the rain.

What are you hoping to achieve by arguing with someone who doesn’t like your project? Do you expect that he’ll come around to your way of thinking? It won’t happen through words.

Not only does arguing with your critics waste your precious time, but it tells them, and every other crank reading, that you’re willing to engage in debate about what you’re doing. Don’t encourage them! Let them find a more receptive target.

I’m not saying that factual misstatements need to be ignored.  If something is provably incorrect, go ahead and counter it with facts.  However, most of the time these message thread pissing wars get down to “I would not be doing what you are doing, and therefore you are wrong for doing so.”

The only thing that has a chance of silencing your critics is success at what you do. Arguing with the naysayers doesn’t get you any closer to that.